From Pajamas Media:

The Department of Homeland Security’s release of the “right-wing extremism” report should anger everyone. Janet Napolitano’s faux apology to veterans glossed over the real message of this memo: to intimidate the 60 million Americans who voted against Obama.

Consider the current Department of Homeland Security’s definitions of “extremists” according to this memo: those worried about the usurpation of the Constitution, illegal immigration, and the threat of gun control legislation. Consider the way these real fears are cast: “Many right-wing extremist groups perceive recent gun control legislation as a threat to their right to bear arms”; also they have the “perception that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs” (emphases added).

This administration labels those who see such real dangers for what they are as delusional. Perhaps they see us as needing a little help from government psychiatrists?

Obama himself, far from the bipartisan spirit promised — indeed, even the respect expected from the officeholder — mocks opposing opinions. He did it recently by ridiculing those who listen to Rush Limbaugh and he did it during his “town hall” meeting in Arnold, Missouri, to mark his first 100 days. He cast tea party participants as those “waving tea bags around.” His assertion then that he would be happy to have a “conversation” about federal spending and his warning that while “we have to tighten belts, [we] have to do it in an intelligent way” were audacious displays of disdain for Americans in light of his midnight-3:00 p.m. push-through of the “stimulus” bill. Does he think we have forgotten how much time he gave Congress to sign a bill over a thousand pages long — and after promising five days for public review of all bills?

In light of the events of just the first 100 days, we should be worried.

Those who would be concerned about Obama’s anti-America rhetoric and friendliness to world dictators, as well as appointments of advisors who believe international law should trump American law, might very well and quite logically fear “a world government that would usurp the sovereignty of the United States and its Constitution, thus infringing upon their liberty.” But it’s a belief that Homeland Security casts as extreme.

There is nothing in Obama’s background to suggest a love for his country, from the church he attended for twenty years to his work for the subversive ACORN to his law school teaching of anti-constitutional critical race theory courses. Obama rivals the tyrants of history in his race to nationalize companies and banks. Although he asserted during his town hall meeting that he has no interest in running companies, he has forced financial institutions to accept TARP money and then refused to allow them to pay that money back. He has fired the top GM executive and forced the merger of Chrysler with a foreign car company. He told bank executives that only he stands between them and the “pitchforks” — after Soros-supported “protesters” showed up at executives’ homes days earlier. The repeated refrains by Obama and his administration that “we won” to upbraid dissenters reveal a profound divergence from the traditional notions of national service. This refrain is suited to the leader of a coup.

Read the Rest of this Article at Pajamas Media.

Tags See All Tags Add New Tag...

Please Enter New Tags Separated By Comma's
  Or Close

Chrysler  Chrysler Bankruptcy  General Motors  Homeland Security  Homeland Security Report  Janet Napolitano  Obama  Obama Administration  Radical Extremists  Radical Right Wing Extremists  Rightwing Extremism  TARP 

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Revolution Coming?
written by Libertariot, May 04, 2009

It is time for us to start throwing people out of congress and start taking back our government! The Homeland Security Department is striking against us, the very people that they are supposed to be protecting! This is the very problems that develop from Big Governments.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Did Obama attack us with Air Force One?
written by Kelley , May 04, 2009

Last Monday, Scare Force One mysteriously strafed lower Manhattan, which is the financial district of New York. At the time this bizarre and probably criminal, behavior made no sense whatsoever...other than it terrorized tens of thousands, or perhaps millions, of people as word of the air space breech became known.

But in the fullness of one week, the real reason might be slapping us in the face. Since the strafing, we learn that Obama threatened to conduct a smear campaign against a major lender to Chrysler if the company wouldn't go along with his lowball offer.

Today or yesterday, Obama said in his own words that he was going to make Wall Street less important - as if it were the president's sworn duty to manipulate the private sector.

It's now clear that the strafing was a physical shot across the bow of Wall Street, letting them know he could and would do anything to destroy the Captains of industry and all its minions.

The crazed flight is now looking like a kinder, gentler, softer version of Kristallnacht. The purpose of Kristallnacht was to instill fear and demonstrate raw power. The purpose of the 'terrorflight' was to do the same.

At first, we asked ourselves how could the White House not know that such an act would terrify the residents of Manhattan. Now it's clear they did know, just as any 8th grader at any lower Manhattan public school would be able to tell you. It was Obama's intention all along to frighten and intimidate Wall Street.

They got his calling card last week on April 27, 2009. He's coming for you, and he's not restricted by law, only by his own desires.

It's important that this dangerous man be called to account for his despotic deeds. If not, we could be reliving 1938 all over again, only this time the tyrant is our own.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

...
written by Cathy M., May 05, 2009

I want to share this article on my Facebook page, but see no link to do so. I don't necessarily want to email or bookmark it. I would suggest setting up, as many other sites have done, the capacity for us to "share" this on FB, Digg, etc. easily and quickly, and with the ability to share our comments about the article as well. This type of information needs to be out there and we're willing to help do that - please make it easier for us to do so.

• 
• +1
• 
• 

Name

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

Add Comment